Think of That

The Official Blog of Why Didn't I Think of That?

The Story of Pandora Radio

By benjaminchristopher, February 17, 2010 12:40 pm

A radio station that learns from your preferences, and only plays music you like.

Now why didn’t I think of that?

Ten years ago, such an idea would have sounded like science fiction to most people, but not to Tim Westergren, the founder of Pandora.com.

Westergren was a musician. He went in and out of bands that saw varying degrees of success. At one point, he took a job composing scores for films. Making music for movies, Westegren found, was a lot different than just jamming out with band mates. It was more direct, more calculating. He found that different directors liked different styles of musical composition. Westergren began to wonder if he could “codify” the tastes of the directors he was working for, to somehow break them down into something predictable, formulaic even.

This new, analytical way of looking at music became more than just a curiosity for Westergren. It led him to start a company that focused on decoding music, what he called the Music Genome, in order to bring people more of the sort of music they liked.

“We tried to build a business on different ways of using the Music Genome,” Westergren says. One of the ways they envisioned utilizing it was to integrate the technology into listening kiosks in music stores. This business plan quickly evolved, and with the help of some venture capital, the “Music Genome Project” was born in 2000.

The Music Genome Project is the backbone of Pandora Internet Radio. The goal of the project is to take music and boil it down to quantifiable data. Well, sort of quantifiable. Every song in the Genome’s library (there are over 700,000 with roughly 10,000 new songs being added each month) is analyzed by a “musicologist.” These musicologists are usually musicians themselves with strong backgrounds in music theory. They break down and rate over 400 attributes of every song, from the “soulfulness” of the vocals to the rhythmic and key changes in a given song.

Within four years of starting the Music Genome Project, Westergren was ready to launch Pandora.com.

Pandora is a free “Internet Radio” service. You start by picking a song or artist that you like. Pandora then creates a music station based on your selection. The station streams music that’s similar to the band or song you chose.

Maybe the coolest thing about Pandora is that it learns from your preferences. If you don’t like a song, you say so, and Pandora will refine the station with its newfound “knowledge” of your preferences.

Note: If you haven't listened to it yet, check out the Why Didn't I Think of That? story on Pandora.

It will also tell you why each song is appearing on your station.

For instance: I create a radio station based on the band The Small Faces. Then the song “In a Foreign Land” by the Kinks comes on. “Based on what you’ve told us so far, we’re playing this track because it features electric rock instrumentation, a subtle use of vocal harmony, mild rhythmic syncopation, major key tonality and electric rhythm guitars.”

You know, I spent a lifetime refining my musical tastes. It’s almost insulting to have them broken down and reduced to their parts so calculatingly. Almost. Truth is, Pandora has turned me onto more good music than most of my hipster friends have.

And Pandora works with all kind of genres, including rap. When Raekwon comes on my Ghostface Killah station, Pandora’s reasoning for the song’s inclusion is: “because it features east coast rap roots, gangsta rap attitude, R&B influences, funk influences and danceable beats.” You can see why Bob and Greg refer to the categorizing system as “pseudo-scientific” in their WDITOT audio story. I can’t think of many things more subjective than “gangsta-attitude” and “danceable beats.” These aren’t quantifiable attributes we’re dealing with here.

It has the human touch you could say.

As great of an idea as Pandora is, it hasn’t been particularly smooth sailing. Westergren and some of his colleagues went for long stretches without getting paid, just to keep the startup afloat.

Thankfully, Pandora has been growing in popularity. Today it bosts over 35 million listeners. The release of the Pandora iPhone app helped seal the deal. The potential to stream Pandora straight to users’ phones was too much for music lovers to ignore, and the Pandora app quickly outsold the SiriusXM Radio iPhone App.

Though a 2007 ruling threatened to bury Pandora in soaring royalty prices, the matter was finally resolved last summer. “The revised royalties are quite high – higher in fact than any other form of radio,” Westeren wrote on Pandora’s blog. “The system as it stands today remains fundamentally unfair both to Internet radio services like Pandora, which pay higher royalties than other forms of radio, and to musical artists, who receive no compensation at all when their music is played on AM/FM radio.”

Even so, after a large lobbying efforts on the part of Pandora and other Internet radio stations, the royalties were reduced by several hundreths of a cent per song. It may not sound like much, but with thousands upon thousands of songs streamed every day (Pandora claims they get more than 65,000 new users alone in a 24-hour period) all those little fractions of pennies add up.

With recent annual revenues are around $20 million, the folks at Pandora are expecting to finally turn a profit this year.

No one said being a pioneer was easy. And with more and more competitors everyday, like Last.fm and the like, it looks like Internet radio might be the future of listening to music. Who knows? It may not be long before Pandora is streaming into your car stereo.

So if you haven’t done so already, check out Pandora for a few days. Let me know what you think. The way we listen to and consume music has already changed so much in the last 20 years, it’s possible that the change has just begun.

RESOURCES

“The Song Decoders” — NY Times Magazine

“Pandora” WDITOT Audio Piece

“Pandora” — How Stuff Works

“Important Update on Royalties” — Pandora Blog

“Q&A: Tim Westergren”  — Electronic Musician

“Interview with Tim Westergren” — nPost

Nice Try, iPad. (Top 5 Most Important Screens of 2010)

By benjaminchristopher, February 1, 2010 12:27 pm

I guess you could say I was taking a gamble by banking on an unreleased, unannounced product as being the Number 1 Most Important Screen of 2010.

I guess you could also say that I lost the gamble.

Last Wednesday, Steve Jobs and company released Apple’s newest, long-rumored product: a tablet-computer called the iPad.

It's called the iPad? Unfortunately. One of the other speculated names Apple was considering, and a far better choice in my opinion, was iSlate. But some feared "Slate" would sound too ancient and heavy for such a modern, lightweight device.

So what is it?

Well… It’s a giant iPhone.

More accurately, it’s a cross between an iPhone and a laptop. If you really don’t know anything about the product, I’ll let Apple sell it to you themselves. Head over to the iPad site for details, videos, and demonstrations. In the mean time, I’m going to try and keep this as brief as possible.

The iPad is certainly a slick little device. And it’s almost affordable. The bare bones version, with no 3G and only 16 GB of memory goes for $499. Another way of saying this is: It’s over 800 dollars if you want 3G Wireless, and 64 GB of memory. As a point of reference- my iPod Classic, which is at least a year old and was not even the biggest model when i got it, has 120 GB of memory.

The revolutionary Apple iPad is… not revolutionary. The iPhone was revolutionary. And it was my thinking, along with a lot of other bloggers, consumers, and tech-enthusiasts, that Apple was going to be presenting something really groundbreaking here, something that would make the iPad not just a neat gadget, but a state-of-the-art must have.

It’s got some cool features, and I’m sure some of the new apps that people will develop will be truly revolutionary. Will it work as an e-reader? Sure I can hold it in my hands, but it’s not going to be any easier on my eyes than a computer screen would be. It doesn’t have the easy-looking effect that the Kindle does.

And I’m not crazy about the fact that the the only Apps you can run are through Apple’s App store. That made sense with the iPhone. After all, it was a phone. This is a computer. And make no mistake, the third-party software’s availability is controlled entirely by Apple. Anyone familiar with Apple turning down the free, game-changing Google Voice App for the iPhone can see the danger here. Any App, no matter who developed it or what it does, can be rejected by Apple for any reason, or for no reason.

So what do I do, here? I’m excited by the iPad, but at the same time, I am quite underwhelmed. I would have been happy to give the iPad almost any spot on my silly little Top 5 Most Important Screens of 2010 list.

Except the number one spot.

Might the iPad signify a shift in computing? Yes. Tablet computing very well could be the way of the future. It makes perfect sense to me. And if any existing product is going to kick-start the tablet-computing craze, the iPad would be it.

But what is the iPad really going to do for you and your business that a laptop couldn’t do? The iPhone introduced a slew of features that the mobile phone world had never known. The iPad does not provide anything comparable.

It is cool. Really cool, even. But not much else. So…

Sorry, Apple. Maybe next time.

Until further notice, this countdown will remain in limbo. As I said, if I had started knowing what I know now, I would have happily gave the iPad a spot on the Top 5. And it still might earn a number one spot. I’d love to see how people wind up using the iPad, and what sort of Apps are developed for it that can truly make a difference in the computing world.

In the mean time, let’s get back to some stories that really scream, “Why Didn’t I Think of That?” Because hey, that’s what we’re about here.

Thanks for reading. Feel free to yell at me in the comments.

apple.com/ipad

Panorama Theme by Themocracy